Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Philadelphia Taxi Association, Inc., et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 17-1871 · judgment March 27, 2018
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Third Circuit decision below, a business petitioner, and a petition filed soon after the judgment below, and down for a business respondent.
Questions presented
-
When is an illegal presence in the marketplace predatory, anti-competitive and threatens to harm competition and not solely competitors?
-
Does the Second Amended Complaint allege illegal and unlawful conduct in the market which, in fact, is anticompetitive and threatens to harm competition and not simply defendant’s competitors?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Stephen Ross Bolden
Fell & Spalding
For respondent
Steven A. Reed
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Case
Subject area
Economic Activity (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 1, 2018 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 01 2018Petition DENIED.
- Aug 08 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
- Jul 20 2018Waiver of right of respondent Uber Technologies, Inc. to respond filed.
- Jun 25 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 6, 2018)