Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Nicholas Honchariw v. County of Stanislaus, California, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 16-17256 · judgment March 22, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Whether taking and due process claims arising from a subdivision disapproval ripen under Williamson County Regional Planning Commission et al. v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985) upon disapproval of an initial application or only upon a final, definitive determination of permitted use of property. Whether the procedure set up by the California Supreme Court requiring that all challenges to a subdivision decision be filed within 90 days and barring - later claims provides an available and adequate state - remedy under Williamson for taking claims which do not ripen until later. 01 JUL
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Nicholas James Honchariw
Attorney-at-Law
For respondent
Matthew D. Zinn
Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 3 conferences
Proceedings
- Jul 30 2019JUDGMENT ISSUED.
- Jun 28 2019Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Knick v. Township of Scott, 588 U. S. ___ (2019).
- Jun 26 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/27/2019.
- Dec 05 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
- Nov 29 2018Reply of Nicholas Honchariw not accepted for filing. (December 03, 2018) (Corrected version submitted December 3, 2018)
- Nov 29 2018Reply of petitioner Nicholas Honchariw filed. (12/3/2018)
- Nov 16 2018Brief of respondents County of Stanislaus, CA, et al. in opposition filed.
- Oct 18 2018Response Requested. (Due November 19, 2018)
- Oct 10 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.
- Oct 01 2018Waiver of right of respondents County of Stanislaus, CA, et al. to respond filed.
- Jul 26 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 9, 2018)