Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Ramon Andrew Williams, aka Andrew Denton Williamson v. Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 16-3816, 17-1705 · judgment January 19, 2018

Certiorari denied · January 7, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 5% cert probability

Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before and a Third Circuit decision below.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
E. Joshua Rosenkranz
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Linked docket
18A7

Proceedings

  1. Jan 07 2019
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Dec 19 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
  3. Dec 18 2018
    Reply of petitioner Ramon Andrew Williams filed. (Distributed)
  4. Dec 04 2018
    Brief of respondent Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General in opposition filed.
  5. Oct 26 2018
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 5, 2018.
  6. Oct 25 2018
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 5, 2018 to December 5, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Sep 27 2018
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 5, 2018.
  8. Sep 26 2018
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 4, 2018 to November 5, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
  9. Aug 30 2018
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 4, 2018)
  10. Jul 02 2018
    Application (18A7) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until August 30, 2018.
  11. Jun 26 2018
    Application (18A7) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 31, 2018 to August 30, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.
  12. Jun 26 2018
    Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.