Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
William S. Poff v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 16-30141 · judgment March 7, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
Petitioner is a disabled military veteran currently serving a federal prison sentence. While incarcerated, Petitioner is entitled to approximately $133 a month in veterans disability benefits. At sentencing, the district court issued a restitution payment schedule based on Petitioner’s financial circumstances. Petitioner has fully complied with that payment schedule. Without notice, the government seized Petitioner’s accumulated monthly veterans disability benefits as payment toward the restitution he owes. Petitioner challenged the seizure as beyond the scope of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 (“MVRA”). The questions presented are:
-
Under the MVRA, an individual who “receives substantial resources from any source, including inheritance, settlement, or other judgment, during a period of incarceration, . . . shall be required to apply the value of such resources to any restitution . . . still owed.” 18 U.S.C. § 3664(n). Does the periodic deposit of regular payments that were in effect at sentencing qualify as the receipt of windfall payments akin to “inheritance, settlement, or other judgment” that constitute “substantial resources” and can be immediately seized under the MVRA?
-
The MVRA exempts from restitution enforcement “[a]ny amount payable to an individual as a service-connected . . . disability benefit.” 26 U.S.C. § 6334(a)(10); 18 U.S.C. § 3613. Do veterans disability benefits lose their exempt status when paid by the government?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Ashley Elizabeth Johnson
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 08 2019JUDGMENT ISSUED.
- Jan 07 2019Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Lagos v. United States, 584 U. S. ___ (2018).
- Nov 28 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
- Nov 28 2018Reply of petitioner William S. Poff filed. (Distributed)
- Nov 14 2018Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
- Oct 09 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 14, 2018.
- Oct 05 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 15, 2018 to November 14, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
- Sep 06 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 15, 2018.
- Sep 05 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 13, 2018 to October 15, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
- Aug 14 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 13, 2018)