Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Richard Leland Neal v. B. Marc Neal, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 18-15612 · judgment December 19, 2018

Certiorari denied · October 7, 2019

Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.

Question presented

Whether the Arizona District Court and the Ninth Circuit created a split by holding that “defendants timely responded to Plaintiffs amended complaint by filing a motion to dismiss (pursuant F.R.Civ.P. Rule 12(b)(6)). If the Court denies the motion to dismiss Defendants will be required to answer Plaintiffs complaint;” App.la

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Richard L. Neal

For respondent
Robert L. Sirianni Jr.
Brownstone, P.A.

Case

Subject area
Judicial Power (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Order
Order list, October 7, 2019 · Certiorari denied

Proceedings

Oct 07 2019
Petition DENIED.
Aug 07 2019
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
Aug 06 2019
Reply of petitioner Richard L. Neal filed. (Distributed)
Jul 19 2019
Brief of respondents B. Marc Neal, et al. in opposition filed.
Jun 14 2019
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 22, 2019)