Rattan Nath v. New Jersey

Can New Jersey courts provide cover to racial discrimination by imposing strict criminal liability—even when there is no public nuisance or any compromising of public safety, or health— under a vague ordinance used for revenue generation that criminalizes recycling and requires Petitioner to create a public hazard by dumping loose leaves and recyclable debris/mulch on active roadways: all to raise revenue from singled out minority Petitioner by dispensing with Due Process? II. Is it a taking when New Jersey's regulation enforcement vests unfettered discretion in State actors to single out Petitioner for deprivation of meaningful control over his property taken as a whole in order to impose public burdens, such as raising revenue, which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole