Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Katherine Miller v. Jay Inslee, Governor of Washington, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 16-35939 · judgment February 26, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The Court recently held that a state “requir[ing] that a union serve as exclusive bargaining agent for its employees [is] itself a significant impingement on associational freedoms . . . that would not be tolerated in other contexts.” Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31, 138 S. Ct. 2448, 2478 (2018). The State of Washington compels individuals who operate State subsidized home-based childcare businesses, and who are not government employees, to accept an exclusive representative that speaks for them in petitioning, lobbying, and contracting with the State over public policies that affect their profession. The question presented is whether Washington’s compelling nonmember providers to accept a private organization as their exclusive representative for dealing with the State over public policy is one of the “other contexts” in which the “significant impingement on associational freedoms” is not tolerated by the First Amendment.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Milton L. Chappell
c/o National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundatio
For respondent
Scott A. Kronland
Altshuler Berzon, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Amicus briefs
3 cert-stage
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2019Petition DENIED.
- Sep 11 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
- Sep 10 2019Reply of petitioner Katherine Miller filed.
- Aug 27 2019Brief of respondent Service Employees International Union, Local 925 in opposition filed.
- Aug 27 2019Brief of respondents State of Washington in opposition filed.
- Jul 18 2019Brief amicus curiae of Goldwater Institute filed.
- Jul 16 2019Brief amici curiae of Buckeye Institute, et al., filed.
- Jul 02 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 27, 2019, for all respondents.
- Jun 26 2019Blanket Consent filed on behalf of Petitioner, and respondents.
- Jun 25 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 18, 2019 to August 27, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jun 18 2019Response Requested. (Due July 18, 2019)
- Jun 14 2019Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed.
- Jun 04 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
- May 30 2019Waiver of right of respondents Jay Inslee; Cheryl Strange; David Schumacher to respond filed.
- May 30 2019Waiver of right of respondent Service Employees International Union, Local 925 to respond filed.
- May 24 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 28, 2019)