Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Mitra Rangarajan v. Johns Hopkins University, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 17-1834, 17-1835, 17-1836 · judgment February 22, 2019
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
Before this Honorable Court is the question of when it is appropriate to dismiss an action for discovery violations under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, in light of the split in practice among federal circuits. Relatedly, the following sub-questions are also before the Court:
-
Whether an action can be dismissed for discovery violations for which a representing attorney alone is responsible.
-
Whether the discovery violations must prejudice the other side, and to what extent, for dismissal to qualify as an appropriate sanction.
-
Whether a warning that dismissal is possible is a prerequisite for dismissal as a sanction for discovery violations.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Cary Johnson Hansel III
Hansel Law, P.C.
For respondent
Robert Thomas Smith
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 24 2019Petition DENIED.
- Jun 04 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
- May 22 2019Waiver of right of respondents Johns Hopkins University, et al. to respond filed.
- May 15 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 21, 2019)