Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Glasswall Solutions Limited, et al. v. Clearswift Ltd.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2018-1407 · judgment December 20, 2018


Certiorari denied · October 7, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

This Petition presents the following questions:

  1. Where a threshold patent-eligibility determination under 35 U.S.C. § 101 is presented in a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, under what circumstances can assertions of fact pleaded by a patent owner, and statements of fact recited in a patent specification, be deemed “conclusory legal assertions” a court is “not bound to accept as true,” pursuant to Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007)?

  2. Where a patent infringement complaint asserts as fact that the invention claimed improves computer function by eliminating a then-conventional method, does the Federal Circuit’s determination that the improvement is also conventional present a question of fact that underlies the legal question of patent-eligibility, pursuant to Berkheimer v. H-P Inc., 881 F.3d 1360, 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2018), petition for cert. filed 2018 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 3613 (U.S. Sept. 28, 2018) (No. 18-415)?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Robert James Carlson
Lee & Hayes, P.C.

For respondent
Ramsey M. Al-Salam
Perkins Coie, LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Linked docket
18A907

Proceedings

  1. Oct 07 2019
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Oct 04 2019
    Motion to dismiss by petitioner Glasswall Solutions Limited, et al. received.
  3. Jul 03 2019
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
  4. Jun 28 2019
    Reply of petitioners Glasswall Solutions Limited, et al. filed.
  5. Jun 19 2019
    Brief of respondent Clearswift, Ltd. in opposition filed.
  6. May 17 2019
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 19, 2019)
  7. Mar 07 2019
    Application (18A907) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until May 19, 2019.
  8. Mar 06 2019
    Application (18A907) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 20, 2019 to May 19, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.