Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Cliven Bundy
Paid petition
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for no court below (an original writ).
Question presented
Did the Ninth Circuit err in failing to vacate the erroneous denial of Mr. Larry Klayman’s (“Mr. Klayman”) admission pro hac vice in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada despite the fact that it is now moot, yet still causing Mr. Klayman grave and serious injury?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Larry Elliot Klayman
Klayman Law Group, P.A.
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Subject area
Attorneys (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 1, 2018 · Mandamus denied
Proceedings
- Oct 01 2018Petition DENIED.
- Aug 15 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
- Aug 03 2018Waiver of right of respondent UNITED STATES to respond filed.
- Jul 20 2018Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due August 30, 2018)