Susan Lloyd v. Becky Doherty, Judge, Court of Common Pleas, Portage County, Ohio, et al.

Susan Lloyd is a disabled US Citizen residing at all relevant times in the State of Ohio. Lloyds civil rights have been violated by all Defendants since 2016. Lloyd has been discriminated against for owning service dogs, the Sunshine Law has been violated, Lloyds pro se status has been abused by the Northern District of Ohio and the 6t1 Circuit Court of Appeals, and Lloyds case was unjustly dismissed even after Judge Adams himself opined Lloyd states claims in which relief can be given. In fact, Doherty has even recused herself from Lloyds underlying state cases admitting she is biased and prejudiced towards Lloyd. Lloyd was never given the opportunity to conduct discovery, or present any evidence. In fact, Lloyds oral argument was even denied by the 6th Circuit. The questions presented are: Is a magistrate and judge allowed to refuse well behaved service dogs in a courtroom? Is a judge allowed to violate the Sunshine Laws by ignoring public record requests? Is a judge and Court reporter allowed to change a transcript? Are Defendants immune especially as in this case where they show a repeated pattern of abuse towards Lloyd? Does a pro se litigant have more leeway or can their case be dismissed before any evidence is presented or given the chance to repair any defects in the pleading? Should a litigants case be dismissed when A. the underlying District Court stated the litigant states claims in which relief can be given and B. the court of Appeals state the case should be stayed? Should any judge preside over a case when his mental stability is being called into question?