Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Ernest Hunter v. District of Columbia

Paid petition · District of Columbia Court of Appeals, No. 16-CV-687 · judgment May 8, 2018

Certiorari denied · October 1, 2018
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Is the application of the relevant personnel rules of the District of Columbia, including the Abolishment and D.C. Whistleblowers Acts (DCWPA) by the District's Office of Employee of Appeals (OEA) and the District of Columbia's District Court and Circuit Court of Appeals, unconstitutional?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Ernest Hunter

For respondent
Stacy Louise Anderson
Office of the Attorney General for D.C.

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 01 2018
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Aug 15 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
  3. Aug 09 2018
    Waiver of right of respondent District of Columbia to respond filed.
  4. Jul 18 2018
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 30, 2018)