Nevenka Obuskovic v. Kathleen L. Wood, et al.

Was Federal law violated under color of law, for violations of Fourteenth Amendment substantive and procedural Due Process and Equal Protection Under the Law, when husband's attorney working with family court judge discriminated against Petitioner wife denied Petitioner access to marital equitable distribution of business and personal marital monies preventing her from hiring counsel to represent and defend her in a divorce matter? Was Fourteenth Amendment Due Process violated when Petitioner forced her to represent herself pro se, lacking knowledge and skills of an attorney, while her husband was unfairly allowed to access all monies from the marital business and marital equitable distribution to pay his licensed, practiced attorneys for the full duration of the divorce matter? Defendants by their actions have made the Petitioner a tool to promote private welfare for themselves without the regard to Petitioner's constitutional rights. If anybody like the Petitioner could be robbed of their essential rights and have no voice, where the lower courts failed to correct this injustice, filing this single last exception presenting this petition to the Supreme Court is the last resort in this action. If any person, men or women, can be easily deprived from their constitutional freedoms to fulfill the wishes of the rich litigant and their paid attorneys, then what is equality and freedom now than in 1837 during slavery?