Jean Coulter v. ADT Security Services, et al.

This Case presents a significant issue of Public Safety for 8 million American families! After moving to New Jersey, Coulter could no longer contact the ADT Security System which Monitored a home in Pennsylvania. Frustrated, Coulter spoke with forty (40) of ADT's employees - before ADT finally took steps to correct the problem which produced ADT's complete failure to notify Coulter, and all affected customers, when their Security System was incapable of meaningful notification of alarms for burglary or fire! ADT was most certainly aware of this critical failure of its "monitoring" for all of ADT's 8 million customers yet ADT obviously - chose to conceal this critical breakdown! This proves ADT's complete disregard for the safety of their customers, as ADT's Marketing Decision placed 8 million Americans families in jeopardy when they unknowingly placed their trust and their family's safety in an unscrupulous "security service" and - makes it clear that ADT's bottom-line is the only consideration even when lives are at stake! - (a) Questions Presented for Review Did "Fraud in Inducement" occur, and is it applicable for Renewals or later Implied Contracts (until the Fraud is discovered)? 2 & 3 are QUESTIONS OF FIRST IMPRESSION a. Can a Written Contract "renew" if only portions of it are "renewed" or is it now an Implied Contract (without automatic renewals, Contractual Period of Limitations, new equipment, etc.)? b. Does an Implied Contract "renew"? Is Choice of Law incorrect as immediate sale of the Contract was scheduled, and cancellation provided for, in contract's terms, in case of non-sale? 1.