Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Alexander L. Baxter v. Brad Bracey, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 18-5102 · judgment November 8, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Does binding authority holding that a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment when he uses a police dog to apprehend a suspect who has surrendered by lying down on the ground “clearly establish” that it is likewise unconstitutional to use a police dog on a suspect who has surrendered by sitting on the ground with his hands up?
-
Should the judge-made doctrine of qualified immunity, which cannot be justified by reference to the text of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or the relevant common law background, and which has been shown not to serve its intended policy goals, be narrowed or abolished?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Scott Michelman
ACLU of the District of Columbia
For respondent
Melissa Sue Roberge
Metropolitan Government Department of Law
Argument & decision
Decided June 15, 2020.
Proceedings
- Jun 15 2020Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)
- Jun 08 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.
- Jun 01 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
- May 22 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
- May 18 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
- May 13 2020Rescheduled.
- Apr 28 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
- Jan 08 2020Rescheduled.
- Jan 06 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
- Dec 11 2019Rescheduled.
- Nov 26 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.
- Oct 15 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.
- Oct 15 2019Rescheduled.
- Oct 08 2019Rescheduled.
- Oct 07 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
- Sep 23 2019Rescheduled.
- Jul 10 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
- Jul 09 2019Reply of petitioner Alexander L. Baxter filed. (Distributed)
- Jun 25 2019Brief of respondents Brad Bracey, et al. in opposition filed.
- May 31 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 1, 2019.
- May 31 2019Brief amici curiae of Legal Scholars filed.
- May 31 2019Brief amici curiae of Cross-Ideological Groups Dedicated to Ensuring Official Accountability, Restoring the Public's Trust in Law Enforcement, and Promoting the Rule of Law filed.
- May 30 2019Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
- May 23 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 31, 2019 to July 1, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
- May 01 2019Response Requested. (Due May 31, 2019)
- Apr 23 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
- Apr 17 2019Waiver of right of respondents Brad Bracey, et al. to respond filed.
- Apr 08 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 10, 2019)
- Jan 28 2019Application (18A756) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until April 8, 2019.
- Jan 17 2019Application (18A756) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 6, 2019 to April 7, 2019, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.