Jason Brian Braun v. Department of the Interior, et al.

When a district court has erred and it's brought to their attention in contrast of that information a case continues to progress forward without correction in violation of its own local rules & Fed. Rules Civ. Procedure a series of events begins to erode at the claims process, damaging the totality of a claim for all who seek corrective action. That damage leads the district court to remove a party from the claim that should justly be held accountable. When a district court finalizes its decision under Title WI to change the venue to another state where the Petitioner lacks the ability and resources when other venue options are within the district courts, defendant's & claimant's ability the rights of the claimant become infringed upon. The Appellate Court for the district that made the venue change becomes crucial through the Writ of Mandamus petition process. When the Court of Appeals also denies motions by the Petitioner for status conference its an issue of a violation under the Constitution. Whether this Court should use its authority to by ensuring that all rules and regulations are followed and reverse the district court order and correct any and all errors to include a location the Petitioner can travel to? Whether any of the Due Process Rights of the Petitioner were violated when the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit dismissed the Petitioners Claim and denied Status Conference Motion without hearing all the Petitioners grievances.