Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Peli Popovich Hunt v. David M. Goodrich, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 18-56257 · judgment October 19, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
QUESTIONS NUMBER ONE Does bankruptcy jurisdiction consistent of more than one type of jurisdiction, and if so, is one type of jurisdiction more dominate than all the other types of jurisdiction? United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa, 559 U.S. 260 (2010); also see e.g., Davis v. Wakelee, 156 U.S. 680, 685-87 (1895) (Davis); also see, also see e.g., Bernards v. Johnson, 314 U.S. 19 (1941); Compare, BNSFRy. Co. v. Tyrell, 137 S.Ct. 1549, 1557 (2017). QUESTIONS NUMBER TWO Does any or mandate bind Courts exercising appellate jurisdiction to the previous and mandate, even if, multiple appeals are taken where any aspect of jurisdiction was erroneously decided, no jurisdictional analysis was made, or both, and if not, why not? Aria Christian Sch. Tuition Org. v. Winn,
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Peli Popovich Hunt
For respondent
David Gould
Gould & Gould LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- May 20 2019Petition DENIED.
- Apr 30 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
- Apr 03 2019Waiver of right of respondent David M. Goodrich to respond filed.
- Jan 09 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 19, 2019)