Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Alvin S. Kanofsky v. City of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Paid petition · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, No. 181 C.D. 2017 · judgment November 29, 2017

Certiorari denied · May 20, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

New Questions Asked Belt.raml Case - 181 CD QUESTIONS ASKED Was the city responsible for the so-called violations? Recommended Answer:YES Was the City fraudulently citing him numerous times for violations that they caused? Recommended Answer: YES Did City force entry into the property and thus trespass on the Property? Recommended Answer: YES Did Kanofsky have permission to store personal items in the building? Recommended Answer: YES Should courts stop characterizing his testimony as irrelevant and frivolous? Recommended Answer: YES Did Kanofsky cause damage to Front Window. Recommended answer: NO Did City's front loader hitting the side wall during snow removal cause the broken window and collapse of the roof? Recommended Answer: YES Did City maliciously maliciously cite Kanofsky Multiple times for his violations? Recommended Answer. YES Did Officer Hackett give false testimony? Recommended Answer YES Has this case been considered earlier by this court in other cases involving violations of defendants property? Recommended answer: YES Is the city basically acting fraudulently and corruptly? Recommended Answer: YES Is the city corruption linked to the widespread corruption in • the Lehigh Valley? Recommended Answer. YES Are there numerous conflicts of interest involved with the Judges? Recommended Answer YES

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Alvin Kanofsky

For respondent
Matthew J. Deschler
City of Bethlehem Law Bureau

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. May 20 2019
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Apr 30 2019
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.
  3. Apr 17 2019
    Waiver of right of respondent The City of Bethlehem to respond filed.
  4. Dec 26 2018
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 18, 2019)