Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Brian Grimm v. Maryland

Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Maryland, No. 37, September Term, 2017 · judgment April 20, 2018


Certiorari denied · October 1, 2018
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

  1. When a defendant challenges the reliability of a dog’s reported alert to the possible presence of drugs in a vehicle, in accordance with Florida v. Harris, 568 U.S. 237 (2013), and the trial court rules that the dog reliably alerted, which suffices to establish probable cause to search the vehicle, what standard of appellate review of the trial court’s ruling that the dog reliably alerted does the Fourth Amendment require?

  2. Did the dog reliably alert to the possible presence of drugs in the vehicle driven by Petitioner for purposes of establishing probable cause to search the vehicle?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Jeffrey Mark Ross
Office of the Public Defender

For respondent
Carrie J. Williams
Goodell DeVries Leech & Dann

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 01 2018
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Sep 05 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
  3. Aug 21 2018
    Waiver of right of respondent State of Maryland to respond filed.
  4. Jul 19 2018
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 27, 2018)