In Re Alan Giordani

Whether the failure of the District Court to appoint a federal monitor, or special master to review the matter was error. Whether the District Court's failure to inform and put petitioner on notice, that it intended to undertake a sua sponte summary review of issues presented, without providing the petitioner an opportunity to formally rebut or reply to the res judicata issue, constituted a violation of due process, and was an abuse of discretion, authority and a violation of the First Amendment and the right to petition government for a redress of grievances. Whether the failure of the District Court to recognize that in failing to read or comprehend the survey maps and metes and bounds descriptions within the subject title deed presented, it also failed to recognize that the matters pertained to two separate and distinct parcels of land, and that the Court's unilateral confusion was an error, in which it proceeded to summarily dismiss the petition. Whether the District Court's continued failure to further comprehend that its reliance on the 1997 Queens County Court Decision by Judge David Goldstein, addressing an adjoining property tract involving an adverse possession and abandonment claim, resulted in its unconstitutional misapplication of the Rooker-Feidman doctrine. Whether the District Court's error included the failure to recognize that the disposal of the underlying private property claim was not inherently