Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Stephanie C. Stucky v. Dwight Takeno, et al.
Paid petition · Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii, No. CAAP-14-0001019 · judgment May 25, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Did the Petitioner in this case receive due process of law when the Respondent/Intervenor, Hawai‘i Labor Relations Board dismissed Petitioner’s Prohibited Practice Complaint on alleged grounds of being “moot” because Respondents voluntarily ceased continued violations of the subject Collective Bargaining Agreement only subsequent to Petitioner filing her Prohibited Practices Complaint before the Hawai‘i Labor Relations Board?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Shawn Anthony Luiz
Shawn A. Luiz, Attorney at Law
For respondent
Scott A. Kronland
Altshuler Berzon, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 22 2019Petition DENIED.
- Apr 02 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
- Mar 26 2019Waiver of right of respondents Dwight Takeno, Ray Camacho, Eric Nagamine, David Forrest, and Hawai'i State Teachers Association to respond filed.
- Mar 25 2019Waiver of right of respondent Hawaii Labor Relations Board to respond filed.
- Feb 21 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 27, 2019)