Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
SkyWest, Inc., et al. v. Andrea Hirst, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 17-3643, 17-3660 · judgment December 12, 2018
Before the decision, about 3.5× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a petition filed soon after the judgment below, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).
Questions presented
-
Is a state law exempt from the Dormant Commerce Clause merely because it does not discriminate against interstate commerce?
-
Is a state law exempt from the Dormant Commerce Clause merely because Congress has passed a federal statute saving the law from preemption under that statute?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Shay Dvoretzky
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
For respondent
Gregory F. Coleman
Greg Coleman Law P.C.
Proceedings
- Jun 24 2019Petition DENIED.
- Jun 04 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
- May 13 2019Reply of petitioners SkyWest, Inc., et al. filed.
- Apr 24 2019Brief of respondents Andrea Hirst, et al. in opposition filed.
- Mar 25 2019Brief amicus curiae of Airlines for America filed.
- Mar 25 2019Brief amicus curiae of American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed.
- Mar 14 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 24, 2019.
- Mar 12 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 25, 2019 to April 24, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
- Feb 27 2019Letter amending the Corporate Disclosure Statement received by petitioners.
- Feb 15 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 25, 2019)