Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Minnesota v. Mark Jerome Johnson
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Minnesota, No. A17-842, A17-883 · judgment November 19, 2018
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Is this Court’s ruling in Birchfield v. North Dakota, 136 S.Ct. 2160 (2016)—that a motorist may not be criminally punished for refusing to submit to a blood test unless law enforcement has a warrant or an exception to the warrant requirement applies—a new substantive rule of federal constitutional law that applies retroactively to cases on collateral review?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Thomas R. Ragatz
Ramsey County Attorney's Office
For respondent
Cathryn Young Middlebrook
Minnesota Public Defender's Office
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Jun 24 2019Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
- Jun 24 2019Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Mothers Against Drunk Driving GRANTED.
- Jun 24 2019Petition DENIED.
- Jun 04 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
- May 30 2019Reply of petitioner Minnesota filed.
- May 16 2019Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Mark J. Johnson.
- May 16 2019Brief of respondent Mark J. Johnson in opposition filed.
- May 16 2019Certificate of service filed with respect to brief in opposition of respondent Mark J. Johnson.
- Apr 25 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 3, 2019.
- Apr 22 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 1, 2019 to June 3, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
- Apr 01 2019Response Requested. (Due May 1, 2019)
- Mar 20 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
- Mar 20 2019Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Mothers Against Drunk Driving. (Distributed)
- Mar 06 2019Waiver of right of respondent Mark J. Johnson to respond filed.
- Feb 19 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 25, 2019)