Lenard Johnson v. Richard Winfrey, Jr.

I. Does Franks v. Delaware1 analysis apply when a court opines information omitted from a warrant application is material to establishing probable cause, and if so, is omitted information evaluated differently than false statements an officer included in the warrant application? II. Did the warrant application Deputy Lenard Johnson submitted inevitably violate clearly established law if an appellate court opines 11 years later the affidavit omitted information material to establishing probable cause? III. Did Richard Winfrey, Jr.’s claim brought under Franks v. Delaware accrue when Winfrey was aware of the factual content of information Deputy Johnson is accused of falsely presenting in the warrant application he submitted? 1. 438 U.S. 154, 155-56, 98 S. Ct. 2674, 2676 (1978).