Veeramuthu P. Gounder v. Communicar, Inc., et al.

Three cases bearing individual case index numbers, CV-092419- 1 IJQU, CV-027 168-12/QU, CV-03236 1-12/QU, court fees paid, different filing dates, grandfathered, at bench trials more than ten times each, without going for final trial, and not permitted to be consolidated according to decisions of earlier judges, as each case was different, of different matters and subjects, is it legal and ethical for these cases to be consolidated without a motion, and to be overridden by another judge of the same ranking and same court? When a case index number was earlier consolidated into case index number 0924 19-11/QU, and a decision by Hon. Judge Leslie J. Purification on 8-10-2012 to be put back on trial calendar for final trial, is it legal that this case be dismissed incorrectly in bench trial, and not permitted to go to final trial? When a fresh lawyer appears for the first time at court for a hearing for the defendants, without any material or facts of the case, and asks the appellant for copies, without obtaining the required papers from the previous council, and the Appellant refuses, as the briefs run into more than 1000 pages, and the fresh lawyer for the defendant has not filed a notice of appearance, and the Judge Hon. Jodi Orlow removes the Appellant's briefs, and gives them away to the personanon-grata, even though he has not filed notice of appearance, is this a case of Judicial misconduct, as the person who was given all Appellant's papers in an