Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Angelex, Ltd. v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 17-5269 · judgment November 2, 2018
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a D.C. Circuit decision below, a business petitioner, and a petition filed soon after the judgment below.
Questions presented
The Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships, 33 U.S.C. § 1901, et seq. (“APPS”), was enacted by Congress to implement the provisions of the MARPOL treaty and annexes thereto to which the United States of America is a party. As part of APPS, Congress created an ‘after-the-fact’ statutory remedy codified at 33 U.S.C. § 1904(h), which provides that “a ship unreasonable detained or delayed by the Secretary acting under the authority of this chapter is entitled to compensation for any loss or damage suffered thereby.” The M/V ANTONIS G. PAPPADAKIS, a bulk carrier and sole income producing asset belonging to Petitioner, Angelex Ltd., was unreasonably delayed by the United States Coast Guard and/or Customs and Border Protection Agency for one hundred and sixty-five (165) days in the port of Norfolk, Virginia. The questions presented which warrant further review because of their critical legal importance are:
-
Whether the Court below erred by prematurely dismissing Angelex’s case prior to trial and full presentation of Angelex’s evidence; and
-
Whether the Court below erred by failing to apply the correct “reasonableness” standard in its consideration of what constitutes an “unreasonable delay of the vessel” as set forth in 33 U.S.C. § 1904(h).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
George M. Chalos
Chalos & Co. P.C.
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- May 13 2019Petition DENIED.
- Apr 23 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
- Apr 19 2019Reply of petitioner Angelex, Ltd. filed.
- Apr 05 2019Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
- Feb 28 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 5, 2019.
- Feb 27 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 6, 2019 to April 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
- Jan 31 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 6, 2019)