Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Angelex, Ltd. v. United States

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 17-5269 · judgment November 2, 2018


Certiorari denied · May 13, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 4% cert probability

Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a D.C. Circuit decision below, a business petitioner, and a petition filed soon after the judgment below.

Questions presented

The Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships, 33 U.S.C. § 1901, et seq. (“APPS”), was enacted by Congress to implement the provisions of the MARPOL treaty and annexes thereto to which the United States of America is a party. As part of APPS, Congress created an ‘after-the-fact’ statutory remedy codified at 33 U.S.C. § 1904(h), which provides that “a ship unreasonable detained or delayed by the Secretary acting under the authority of this chapter is entitled to compensation for any loss or damage suffered thereby.” The M/V ANTONIS G. PAPPADAKIS, a bulk carrier and sole income producing asset belonging to Petitioner, Angelex Ltd., was unreasonably delayed by the United States Coast Guard and/or Customs and Border Protection Agency for one hundred and sixty-five (165) days in the port of Norfolk, Virginia. The questions presented which warrant further review because of their critical legal importance are:

  1. Whether the Court below erred by prematurely dismissing Angelex’s case prior to trial and full presentation of Angelex’s evidence; and

  2. Whether the Court below erred by failing to apply the correct “reasonableness” standard in its consideration of what constitutes an “unreasonable delay of the vessel” as set forth in 33 U.S.C. § 1904(h).

Counsel of record

For petitioner
George M. Chalos
Chalos & Co. P.C.

For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. May 13 2019
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Apr 23 2019
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
  3. Apr 19 2019
    Reply of petitioner Angelex, Ltd. filed.
  4. Apr 05 2019
    Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
  5. Feb 28 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 5, 2019.
  6. Feb 27 2019
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 6, 2019 to April 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Jan 31 2019
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 6, 2019)