In Re Veronica Hollowell and Vivian Epps

Whether the State Court lacked jurisdiction of the child since the unwed, single-parent mother's case was not Jury adjudicated (the ex-boyfriend/father was already incarcerated for a 2nd DUI offense). Whether the State Court judgement is in violation of the U.S. Constitution and whether the State Court erred in declining to exercise an unwed, lawabiding single-parent Mother's request to be have the issue of her mental fitness adjudicated by a jury before the court took jurisdiction of child. Whether the Appeals Court abuses its discretion when it bases it decision on a clearly erroneous assessment of Petitioner's court docket Delay Discover Rule statement. Whether the Appeals Court abuses its discretion to be allowed to change Petitioner's court docket Discovery Rule wording phase sentences that does connects to the Supreme Court controlling law constitutional statutory. Whether the Appeals Court abused its discretion when the Petitioner's court docket record Discover Rule contains no evidence to support its decision about Petitioner Hollowell alleged saying, "she did not know that she could get legal relief for her injuries" . as . . were stated in the Appeals Court judgment. Whether Petitioner's Federal Court docket Delayed Discovery Rule True and correct statement by federal statute under 42 U.S.C. Section 9658(4)(A) be equitably tolled to have stop Arizona State Statute of limitation.