Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Ann McGeehan v. Michael McGeehan
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Maryland, No. 93, September Term, 2016 · judgment August 10, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Assuming any exist, what are the standards of review, limitations, and proper procedures, with due regard to federalism principles, when the Federal Government invokes 28 U.S.C. §517 (“Interests of United States in Pending Suits”), no agency regulations were adopted and/or applicable, and were these concerns and principles properly applied in this divorce proceeding in state court which precluded production and receipt of Respondent’s salary, pension, and retirement information?
-
Assuming any exist, with due regard to federalism principles and judicial review, what standards of review, limitations, and proper procedures apply to state and federal appellate courts examining the correctness of 28 U.S.C. §517 determinations?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Michael Alan Wein
Law Offices of Michael A. Wein, LLC
For respondent
—
Proceedings
- Mar 19 2018Petition DENIED.
- Mar 13 2018Letter of petitioner Ann McGeehan filed. (Distributed)
- Feb 21 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/16/2018.
- Jan 05 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2018)
- Nov 01 2017Application (17A476) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 5, 2018.
- Oct 27 2017Application (17A476) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 8, 2017 to January 7, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.