Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Larry Shane, et al.
Paid petition
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
Preface Petitioners believe Donald Trump was unlawfully elected President. This Petition lays out facts and the Court’s constitutional authority to resolve this matter of historically unprecedented magnitude. The Petitioners’ sole intent is to protect the public good, and trust the Justices of the Court to consider this Petition as American patriots who will not be bound by partisan politics. Our survival as a Republic depends on Americans having the courage and wisdom to consider these questions. Petitioners present the following Questions:
-
Whether this Court should order a Special Master to be appointed to investigate widespread allegations that the primary and general 2016 presidential elections were corrupted by a Russian cyberwarfare invasion, in collusion with members of the Republican presidential campaign and Republican leaders, and should Robert Mueller be the Special Master to continue the current investigation under the aegis of the Court.
-
Whether the Court should also direct the Special Master to investigate: (a) if the Electors were qualified under the Constitution article II, § 1; (b) if the Electors acted in accordance with the intent of the Framers as delineated particularly in Hamilton’s Federalist No. 68; and (c) if the Electoral College and the Electors should have adhered to the Constitution and the Framer’s
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Neil Kenneth Evans
Retired from Hahn Loeser & Parks
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Feb 20 2018Petition DENIED.
- Jan 31 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2018.
- Nov 20 2017Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due January 16, 2018)