Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Provident Savings Bank, FSB v. Gina McKeen-Chaplin, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 15-16758 · judgment July 5, 2017

Certiorari denied · November 27, 2017
Pre-decision estimate: 4% cert probability

Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a petition filed soon after the judgment below, a Ninth Circuit decision below, and a business petitioner.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Roman Martinez
Latham & Watkins, LLP

For respondent
Matthew Carl Helland
Nichols Kaster LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Amicus briefs
2 cert-stage

Proceedings

  1. Nov 27 2017
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Nov 01 2017
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2017.
  3. Oct 31 2017
    Reply of petitioner Provident Savings Bank, FSB filed.
  4. Oct 18 2017
    Brief of respondents Gina McKeen, et al. in opposition filed.
  5. Oct 11 2017
    Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.
  6. Oct 11 2017
    Brief amici curiae of American Bankers Association, et al. filed.
  7. Sep 29 2017
    Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 18, 2017.
  8. Sep 20 2017
    Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Gina McKeen, et al. on 09/29/2017
  9. Sep 12 2017
    Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Provident Savings Bank on 09/13/2017
  10. Sep 07 2017
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 11, 2017)