Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
United States v. Rene Sanchez-Gomez, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 13-50561, 13-50562, 13-50566, 13-50571 · judgment May 31, 2017
Before the decision, about 4.5× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a federal-government petitioner, a Ninth Circuit decision below, and a petition filed soon after the judgment below.
Questions presented
-
Whether the court of appeals erred in asserting authority to review respondents' interlocutory challenge to pretrial physical restraints and in ruling on that challenge notwithstanding its recognition that respondents' individual claims were moot.
-
Whether the court of appeals erred in concluding that the Fifth Amendment forbids the United States Marshals Service for the Southern District of California, with the approval of the district judges in that high- volume jurisdiction, from implementing a policy of placing pretrial detainees in physical restraints during non-jury court proceedings. GRANTED LIMITED TO QUESTION 1 PRESENTED BY THE PETITION. ELLIS M. JOHNSTON, III, ESQUIRE, OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, IS APPOINTED TO SERVE AS COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT RENE SANCHEZ-GOMEZ IN THIS CASE.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
For respondent
Reuben Camper Cahn
Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Amicus briefs
2 cert-stage · 2 merits
(2 respondent)
Argument & decision
Argued March 26, 2018 — Allon Kedem · Reuben C. Cahn. Audio and transcript
Decided May 14, 2018. Opinion by Roberts, C.J..
Proceedings
- Jun 15 2018JUDGMENT ISSUED.
- May 14 2018Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
- Apr 30 2018Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent GRANTED, and Ellis M. Johnston, III, Esquire, of San Diego, California, is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Rene Sanchez-Gomez in this case.
- Apr 11 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018.
- Mar 26 2018Argued. For petitioner: Allon Kedem, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Reuben C. Cahn, San Diego, Cal.
- Mar 23 2018Motion for appointment of counsel filed by respondent Rene Sanchez-Gomez.
- Mar 14 2018Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)
- Feb 28 2018Brief amici curiae of Former Judges, Former Prosecutors, Former Government Officials, Law Professors, and Social Scientists filed. (Distributed)
- Feb 28 2018Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders filed. (Distributed)
- Feb 21 2018Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.
- Feb 21 2018Brief of respondents Moises Patricio-Guzman, et al. filed. (Distributed)
- Feb 07 2018CIRCULATED
- Jan 24 2018SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, March 26, 2018
- Jan 22 2018Brief of petitioner United States filed.
- Jan 22 2018Joint appendix filed.
- Dec 08 2017Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondents GRANTED.
- Dec 08 2017Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
- Nov 21 2017Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)
- Nov 20 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2017.
- Nov 13 2017Brief of respondents Moises Patricio-Guzman, et al. in opposition filed.
- Nov 13 2017Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Moises Patricio-Guzman
- Nov 13 2017Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Rene Sanchez-Gomez
- Nov 13 2017Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Jasmin Isabel Morales
- Nov 13 2017Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Mark William Ring
- Sep 28 2017Brief amici curiae of Senator Jeff Flake, et al. filed.
- Sep 28 2017Brief amicus curiae of California State Sheriffs' Association filed.
- Sep 19 2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 13, 2017, for all respondents.
- Aug 29 2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 28, 2017)