Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Ozark Materials River Rock, LLC v. David Benham
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 17-5069 · judgment March 22, 2018
Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a petition filed soon after the judgment below, and a business petitioner.
Question presented
Whether the doctrine of primary jurisdiction under United States v. Western Pac. R.R. Co. 352 U.S. 59, 64, 77 S.Ct. 161 (1956) applies and the lower courts should have initially abstained from enforcement of a citizen suit under section 404 of the Clean Water Act because the claims contained questions and issues Congress intended for the Army Corps to address including a jurisdictional determination of wetlands (a JD) or a section 404 permit even though the Army Corps issued Letters of No Violation prior to the commencement of the suit. Whether the lower courts’ decisions are clear error when the testimonial admission of the citizen’s expert that he had no evidence to distinguish whether the deposition of gravel into the alleged wetlands was caused by Ozark or was deposited and filled in by natural causes such as the deposition of tons of rock and gravel from upstream flooding.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Wilfred Kenneth Wright Jr.
Wright Law, PLC
For respondent
Krystina Elizabeth Phillips
Indian and Environmental Law Group, PLLC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 01 2018Petition DENIED.
- Jul 03 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
- Jun 27 2018Waiver of right of respondent David Benham to respond filed.
- Jun 19 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 23, 2018)