Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Colleen M. Bradley v. West Chester University of the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 17-1588 · judgment January 26, 2018
Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Third Circuit decision below, counsel with five or more prior petitions here, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).
Questions presented
-
Is petitioner’s speech exposing her public employer’s false, illegal and corrupt accounting practices, conduct unrelated to her ordinary job duties or her job description, protected as First Amendment citizen speech under Lane v. Franks, 573 U.S.___; 134 S. Ct. 2369 (2014) and Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006)?
-
Has the conflict among the analyses employed by the courts of appeals to determine whether a public employee spoke as a citizen or as an employee on a matter of public concern become so pronounced that it impermissibly chills valuable speech identifying government corruption by whistleblowers like petitioner, invoking this Court’s power to further clarify the analysis for future decisionmaking?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Dennis P. Derrick
For respondent
John Bartley DeLone
Attorney General's Office
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage
Proceedings
- Oct 01 2018Petition DENIED.
- Jul 18 2018Brief amici curiae of Working Faculty and Coaches filed. (Distributed)
- Jul 11 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
- Jul 09 2018Blanket Consent filed by petitioner Colleen M. Bradley
- Jul 03 2018Waiver of right of respondents West Chester University, et al. to respond filed.
- May 29 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 19, 2018)