Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Kevin Checksfield v. Stefan Berg
Paid petition · Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department, No. 522551 · judgment March 16, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Does an Attorney failing to handle his client's interests by not filing a complaint in a timely and professional manner, and then purposely and with intent allowing applicable statutes to run violate his clients rights; and when brought up on Legal Malpractice charges commits perjury in submissions and statements to the courts violate said client's XIV Amendment protections and rights?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Kevin D. Checksfield
For respondent
Stewart L. Weisman
Law Office of Stewart L. Weisman
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 01 2018Petition DENIED.
- Jul 03 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
- Jun 22 2018Waiver of right of respondent Stefan Berg to respond filed.
- Jan 12 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 13, 2018)