Nicole Barone v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

This Court often emphasizes the importance of preserving the public's trust in the legal system. But over the past decade, courts have left the public and homeowners with questionable decisions and actions that have marred the system. Unfortunately, millions harmed are average American's, their families and friends. Every American has been affected, as these outcomes have had a lasting negative effect on the economy and wealth, including record poverty, homelessness, health care costs, low wage jobs and government assistance, while infringing on Constitutional Rights. Herein, there are numerous questionable issues by the courts and others in favor of Wells Fargo and the government's interest in Fannie Mae (FNMA), the alleged note owner. This case raises important issues over the government's direct financial interest in trillions of dollars' in taxpayer backed mortgages, FNMA as de facto State actor, national banks, mortgage securitization (RMBS), default insurance (CDSs and CDOs), Constitutional property rights, foreclosure and modification fraud, standing and void judgements in need of addressing. This case raises questions of Constitutionality of FL law that infringes on Due Process under Amendments V and NEV. Thus, the questions presented are: 1.Whether U.S. Government's indefinite Total Control and exclusive financial benefit of FNMA renders it a de facto State-actor subject to federal jurisdiction and the property "takings" clause of the U.S. Constitution? 2. Whether this Court's holding in Valley Forge the Real-Party-In-Interest-Doctrine, Fed.. R. of Civ. P. 17 & 19, and FL Supreme Court's holding in Kleiser prohibit Wells Fargo and servicers from filing foreclosures when they are not the true owner of the note debt?