Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Melba L. Ford
Paid petition
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
Since the United States failed to contest Petitioner's discovery and presentation of DoJ-supplied evidence that IRS repeatedly falsified digital and paper records to justify a forfeiture action against her, can a federal judge delay dismissing such action forthwith? PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING Melba Ford, Petitioner In Propria Persona The Hon. Dale A. Drozd Respondent
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Melba L. Ford
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 1, 2018 · Mandamus denied
Proceedings
- Oct 01 2018Petition DENIED.
- Jul 03 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
- May 10 2018Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition filed. (Response due June 18, 2018)