Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Jessie D. McDonald
Paid petition
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Questions presented
-
Whether the state supreme court judgment is in violation of the ex post facto clause of the U.S. Constitution? 2.Whether the state supreme court had personal jurisdiction over petitioner to reinstate the criminal conviction in the trial court?
-
Whether the trial court had personal jurisdiction over the petitioner? 4.Whether the trial court had jurisdiction to issue the order of commitment? 5.Whether the trial court judgment of conviction is void? 6.Whether this court exceeded the jurisdiction Conferred, by limiting petitioner to access of this court? 1.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jessie D. McDonald
For respondent
Alexander C. Vey
Office of the Tennessee Attorney General
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 1, 2018 · Mandamus denied
Proceedings
- Oct 01 2018Petition DENIED.
- Jul 03 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
- Jun 11 2018Supplemental brief of petitioner Jessie D. McDonald filed.
- Jun 11 2018Waiver of right of respondent Herbert H. Slatery, III to respond filed.
- May 01 2018Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition filed. (Response due June 18, 2018)