Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance, dba FedLoan Servicing v. Neil Silver
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 16-15664 · judgment December 13, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Does an amendment to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act that insulates parties collecting federal debts “impair rights a party possessed when he acted,” if applied to dismiss a lawsuit pending when the amendment was enacted, and therefore have impermissible retroactive effect under this Court’s Landgraf standard? 1099175.1
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Donald Edward Bradley
Musick, Peeler & Garrett, LLP
For respondent
Seyed Abbas Kazerounian
Kazerouni Law Group APC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 01 2018Petition DENIED.
- Aug 01 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
- Jul 16 2018Brief of respondent Neil Silver in opposition filed.
- Jun 13 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 16, 2018
- Jun 12 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 14, 2018 to July 16, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
- Apr 24 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 14, 2018)