Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Andrew J. Stankevich v. Sabina Kaplan, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 16-7112 · judgment October 24, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Whether the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia adjudicated Andrew Stankevich's claim in a manner "so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings ... as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power[,]" pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 10(a). Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sanctioned the adjudication of Andrew Stankevich's claim in a manner "so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings ... as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power[,]" pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 10(a).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Andrew Stankevich
For respondent
H. Barber Boone
Butler Snow, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 01 2018Petition DENIED.
- Jun 20 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
- Jun 11 2018Waiver of right of respondent Sabina Kaplan to respond filed.
- May 21 2018Waiver of right of respondent Mississippi College to respond filed.
- Apr 20 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 14, 2018)