Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Andrew J. Stankevich v. Sabina Kaplan, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 16-7112 · judgment October 24, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
Whether the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia adjudicated Andrew Stankevich's claim in a manner "so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings ... as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power[,]" pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 10(a). Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sanctioned the adjudication of Andrew Stankevich's claim in a manner "so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings ... as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power[,]" pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 10(a).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Andrew Stankevich
For respondent
H. Barber Boone
Butler Snow, LLP
Case
Subject area
Judicial Power (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 1, 2018 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 01 2018Petition DENIED.
- Jun 20 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
- Jun 11 2018Waiver of right of respondent Sabina Kaplan to respond filed.
- May 21 2018Waiver of right of respondent Mississippi College to respond filed.
- Apr 20 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 14, 2018)