Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Charles Kinney v. Michele R. Clark
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, No. B272408, B276290 · judgment November 1, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Acting As "Prosecutors" When will this - Court stop state court judges from acting as prosecutors under color of right which denies Kinney's federal civil rights [e.g. 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 and 19851 for the benefit of other state court judges [e.g. LASC Judge now Justice Elizabeth Grimes]? Jail Time For Bankruptcy Fraud When - will this Court put a stop to the ongoing bankruptcy fraud by state court judges that enriches discharged Chapter 7 debtor Michele Clark and her unsecured creditor attorneys David Marcus et al; and start enforcing 18 U.S.C; Secs. 152 [false oath or account] and 157 [false representation] which can include 5 years in jail? Enablers Are Flouting the Law -When will this Court put a stop to state court judges who have been enabling a scheme for years whereby any "difficult" attorney or litigant is punished [e.g. by making them lose cases or appeals; by labeling them as a vexatious litigant or as the "puppet" of a vexatious litigant; by disbarring them if they are attorneys; by creating false charges to get them sanctioned; or by awarding attorney fees against them based on an unenforceable prepetition contract] as recently described in detail in a US District Court complaint filed by one of Kinney's attorneys?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Charles G. Kinney
For respondent
Eric Chomsky
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 18 2018Petition DENIED.
- May 29 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/14/2018.
- May 15 2018Waiver of right of respondent Michelle Clark to respond filed.
- Apr 17 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 13, 2018)