Joseph Roberts v. FNB South of Alma, Georgia

The counselor for FNB South made a response to the U.S. District Court alleging: "In all three cases, Defendant was found to have acted appropriately with respect to every account that Plaintiff had at Defendant's bank" (dkt 14 p 1) The bank is liable under the ECOA if the creditor takes an adverse action against .a qualify applicant. The Petitioner is requesting the Court to bring closure to the following questions below. Whether, or not, FNB South after being paid in full on June 23, 2004 had right to continue the deed to secure debt on property. Whether, or not, the bank had right to add the personal property to security agreement in 2007, for an additional 19 years. App. A. and App. B. Whether, or not, FNB South after charging off loan on Dec. 1, 2005, had right to continue charging interest and inflating loans with Petitioner's credit transactions Whether, or not, the IRS will penalized Petitioner company for filing interest on his taxes returns, based on the payment histories received from FNB South during 2006-2010. App. B. And App. C. Whether, or not, FNB South after repossessing the PJ Trailer in 2010, should release Petitioner of future road hazard and liability of trailer. App. B Whether, or not, Petitioner should be served a copy of the written discovery, having attended the Joint Report of Rule 26(f) Conference and Discovery Plan. App. D