Zbigniew Rozbicki v. Chief Disciplinary Counsel

This Petition arises from the Conn. Supreme Court's affirmation of the trial court's decision suspending the Petitioner for four years for accusing two judges of bias and prejudice in Motions for their disqualification. The Statewide Grievance Committee, the Superior Court, and the Conn. Supreme Court refused to acknowledge, consider, or rule on the Petitioner's constitutional free speech and due process defenses raised throughout the grievance proceedings, trial and appeal, citing this Court's reliance on New York Times v. Sullivan, 376. U.S. 254(1964), Garrison v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64 (1964), Landmark Communications v. Virginia, 435 U.S. 829 (1978), and their prodigies. The question presented is whether the Conn. Supreme Court's uncompromising rejection of this Court's rulings in the cited cases, intended to protect attorney's free speech under the First Amendment, has become such an accepted excuse among state and federal judges to punish attorney criticism of judges that it has reached such an oppressive level of abuse that it calls for this Court's curative supervision, intervention, and review?