Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Jose M. Non v. Comcast, Inc., dba Comcast Cable Communications Management LLC, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 15-17259, 15-17260 · judgment September 29, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
1 OPINIONS BELOW The unpublished opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Jose M. Non v. Comcast, Inc. et al., Docket No. 15-17259, filed September 29, 2017, and reported at 697 F. App’x 920 (9th Cir. 2017), affirming the District Court’s order granting summary judgment to respondents, is set forth in the Appendix hereto (App. 1-5). The unpublished Order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, in Jose M. Non v. Comcast, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 14- cv-01845-VC, decided and filed October 8, 2015, and reported at 2015 Dist. LEXIS 137894 (N.D. Cal. 10/8/2015), granting summary judgment to respondents, is set forth in the Appendix hereto (App. 6-8). The unpublished Order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Jose M. Non v. Comcast, Inc. et al., Docket No. 15-17259, filed December 21, 2017, denying petitioner’s timely filed petition for panel rehearing, is set forth in the Appendix hereto (App. 9). JURISDICTION The decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirming the District Court’s order granting summary judgment to respondents was filed September 29, 2017; and its order denying petitioner’s timely filed petition for panel rehearing was filed on December 21, 2017 (App. 1;9).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Daniel Ray Bacon
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jun 04 2018Petition DENIED.
- May 15 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/31/2018.
- Mar 20 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 30, 2018)