Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Universal Processing Services of Wisconsin, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 16-17727 · judgment December 13, 2017


Certiorari denied · June 25, 2018
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

The Federal Trade Commission Act (the “FTC Act”) authorizes the Federal Trade Commission (the “Commission”) to bring suit “to enjoin” a violation of the Act. 15 U.S.C. § 53(b). The questions presented are:

  1. Can a passive service provider found liable solely for a violation of the Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. § 310.3(b), be held jointly and severally liable for the bad acts of common enterprise co-defendants who violated the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 53(b), where, as other Circuit Courts of Appeals have held consistently, such a punitive remedy must be predicated upon a finding of interrelation or control (a “common enterprise”) between defendants that committed the underlying FTC Act violations?

  2. Whether the Federal Trade Commission violated Universal’s due process rights by failing to provide prior warning that it would seek joint and several liability or that such a penalty could apply based on an alleged violation of the Telemarketing Sales Rule?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Lewis Steven Wiener
Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage

Proceedings

  1. Jun 25 2018
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jun 05 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/21/2018.
  3. Jun 01 2018
    Reply of petitioner Universal Processing Services of Wisconsin, LLC filed.
  4. May 16 2018
    Brief of respondent Federal Trade Commission in opposition filed.
  5. Apr 16 2018
    Brief amicus curiae of The Electronic Transactions Association filed.
  6. Apr 11 2018
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 16, 2018 to May 16, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Apr 11 2018
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 16, 2018.
  8. Mar 13 2018
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 16, 2018)