Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Osage Wind, LLC, et al. v. Osage Minerals Council

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 15-5121, 16-5022 · judgment September 18, 2017


Certiorari denied · January 7, 2019
Pre-decision estimate: 4% cert probability

Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a business petitioner, and a Tenth Circuit decision below.

Questions presented

  1. This suit was filed by the United States as trustee for the Osage Nation. Neither the Osage Nation nor the Osage Minerals Council intervened or otherwise participated in any capacity in the district court proceedings. The United States opted not to appeal the district court’s adverse judgment. The first question presented is: Whether the court of appeals had jurisdiction over the appeal filed by a nonparty when the nonparty did not participate in any capacity in the district court proceedings.

  2. The “Osage Act” divided the surface estate from the mineral estate in what is now Osage County, granting the former to individual tribe members and the latter to the Osage Nation. Act of June 28, 1906, ch. 3572, §§ 2-3, 34 Stat. 539, 540-544. Although both estates were intended to benefit Indians, the Tenth Circuit invoked the Indian canon of construction to benefit only the Osage Nation by distorting the clear regulatory definition of “mining” to include the removal and non-commercial manipulation of dirt and rocks in order to construct a structure on the surface. The second question presented is: Whether the Tenth Circuit improperly invoked the Indian canon of construction to deprive surfaceestate owners who are members or successors-ininterest to Indian tribe members of important property rights by overriding clear regulatory language for the express purpose of favoring the economic interests of an Indian tribe without examining congressional intent.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Sarah Elaine Harrington
Covington & Burling LLP

For respondent
Jeffrey Scott Rasmussen
Patterson Earnhart Real Bird & Wilson LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage

Linked docket
17A690

Proceedings

  1. Jan 07 2019
    Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by American Wind Energy Association GRANTED.
  2. Jan 07 2019
    Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Osage County Farm Bureau, Inc., et al. GRANTED.
  3. Jan 07 2019
    Petition DENIED.
  4. Dec 19 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
  5. Dec 18 2018
    Supplemental brief of petitioners Osage Wind, LLC, et al. filed.
  6. Dec 04 2018
    Brief amicus curiae of United States of America filed.
  7. May 14 2018
    The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
  8. Apr 24 2018
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/10/2018.
  9. Apr 23 2018
    Reply of petitioners Osage Wind, LLC, et al. filed.
  10. Apr 19 2018
    Response to motion from respondent Osage Minerals Council filed. (Distributed)
  11. Apr 05 2018
    Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Osage County Farm Bureau, Inc., et al.
  12. Apr 05 2018
    Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by American Wind Energy Association.
  13. Apr 05 2018
    Brief of respondent Osage Minerals Council in opposition filed.
  14. Mar 02 2018
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 5, 2018)
  15. Dec 28 2017
    Application (17A690) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until March 2, 2018.
  16. Dec 27 2017
    Application (17A690) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 15, 2018 to March 2, 2018, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.