Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
William French Anderson v. Dean Borders, Warden
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 17-55130 · judgment October 19, 2017
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition and a Ninth Circuit decision below, and down for a state or local-government respondent.
Question presented
Whether this court should resolve the longstanding conflict among the Circuits as to whether findings by a state court without affording a habeas petitioner an evidentiary hearing result in an “unreasonable determination of the facts” not entitled to deference by a federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Douglas W. Otto
Law Offices of Douglas W. Otto
For respondent
Blythe J. Leszkay
California Attorney General's Office
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, April 2, 2018 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Apr 02 2018Petition DENIED.
- Mar 13 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2018.
- Mar 07 2018Waiver of right of respondent Dean Borders to respond filed.
- Feb 26 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2018)