Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Barclays PLC, et al. v. Joseph Waggoner, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 16-1912 · judgment November 6, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether a defendant seeking to rebut the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance under Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), has a burden of production or a burden of persuasion.
-
Whether plaintiffs may invoke the fraud-onthe-market presumption without direct evidence that the price of the security responded to new, material information during the class period.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jeffrey Thomas Scott
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
For respondent
Jeremy Alan Lieberman
POMERANTZ LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Amicus briefs
3 cert-stage
Proceedings
- Apr 30 2018Petition DENIED.
- Apr 11 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018.
- Apr 10 2018Reply of petitioners Barclays PLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)
- Mar 30 2018Brief amici curiae of Financial Economists and Legal Scholars filed.
- Mar 30 2018Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.
- Mar 30 2018Brief amici curiae of Former SEC Officials and Law Professors filed.
- Mar 23 2018Brief of respondents Joseph Waggoner, et al. in opposition filed.
- Mar 19 2018Blanket Consent filed by Respondents, Joseph Waggoner, et al.
- Mar 14 2018Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Barclays PLC, et al.
- Feb 26 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 30, 2018)