Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Viorel Cotuna v. Walmart Stores, Inc.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 16-2519 · judgment August 31, 2017
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12111(10), requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations to the known physical or mental limitations of an otherwise qualified applicant or employee with a disability, unless the employer can demonstrate that the accommodation would impose an undue hardship. Similar to ADA, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., also prohibits discrimination and retaliation against a status based individual who engaged in protected conduct (42 U.S.C. § 12112). The questions presented, on which the circuits have persistently disagreed, is: Whether an employee with a documented disability could be granted a longer and definite amount of medical leave as a reasonable accommodation, absent undue hardship, necessary in this case to participate in training of his/her service dog. Whether an employer should grant an at least equal amount of leave to a disabled employee as concurrently granted to employees in a distinct protected class under the same policy. Whether the courts should consider ADA's requirements that an employer engage in the "interactive process" with a qualified individual with a disability before taking a detrimental employment action.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Viorel Cotuna
For respondent
Alison M. Day
Littler Mendelson
Case
Subject area
Civil Rights (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, April 2, 2018 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Apr 02 2018Petition DENIED.
- Mar 13 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2018.
- Mar 12 2018Reply of petitioner Viorel Cotuna filed. (Distributed)
- Feb 26 2018Brief of respondent Walmart Stores, Inc. in opposition filed.
- Jan 16 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 26, 2018)