Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Ann L. Martin, et vir v. Adrienne L. Bailey, et al.
Paid petition · Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Office, No. 2049 MDA 2015 · judgment October 13, 2016
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
Does the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause guarantee a civil litigant, in a state court, a trial judge who was not previously a paid attorney retained to advance the same case when it was before the trial court in view of the interim decision in Williams v. Pennsylvania, 579 U.S. (2016)?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Ann L. Martin
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Linked docket
17A513
Order
Order list, March 26, 2018 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Mar 26 2018Petition DENIED.
- Mar 07 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/23/2018.
- Jan 19 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 23, 2018)
- Nov 20 2017Application (17A513) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until January 19, 2018.
- Nov 03 2017Application (17A513) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 21, 2017 to January 20, 2018, submitted to Justice Sotomayor. (Justice Alito is recused.)