Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
SAS Institute Inc. v. Andrei Iancu, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2015-1346, 2015-1347 · judgment June 10, 2016
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Does 35 U.S.C. § 318(a), which provides that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an inter partes review "shall issue a final written decision with respect to the patentability of any patent claim challenged by the petitioner," require that Board to issue a final written decision as to every claim challenged by the petitioner, or does it allow that Board to issue a final written decision with respect to the patentability of only some of the patent claims challenged by the petitioner, as the Federal Circuit held?
Similar questions
Other petitions whose question is worded like this one.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Gregory Andrew Castanias
Jones Day
For respondent
Noel John Francisco
Jones Day
Case
Subject area
Economic Activity (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Amicus briefs
2 merits
(1 supporting pet./neither, 1 respondent)
Argument & decision
Argued November 27, 2017 — Gregory A. Castanias · Jonathan C. Bond. Listen and read along · the Court’s audio
Decided April 24, 2018. Opinion by Gorsuch.
Proceedings
- May 29 2018JUDGMENT ISSUED.
- Apr 24 2018Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, JJ., joined. Ginsburg, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg and Sotomayor, JJ., joined, and in which Kagan, J., joined except as to Part III-A.
- Nov 27 2017Argued. For petitioner: Gregory A. Castanias, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Jonathan C. Bond, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
- Oct 18 2017Record requested from the U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit.
- Oct 18 2017Record received from the U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.
- Oct 12 2017CIRCULATED
- Oct 10 2017Motion for divided argument filed by respondent DENIED.
- Oct 06 2017SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, November 27, 2017
- Oct 05 2017Reply of petitioner SAS Institute Inc. filed.
- Sep 12 2017Motion for divided argument filed by respondent ComplementSoft, LLC.
- Sep 12 2017Brief amicus curiae of Houston Intellectual Property Law Association filed.
- Sep 05 2017Brief of Federal Respondent filed.
- Sep 05 2017Brief of respondent ComplementSoft, LLC filed.
- Jul 20 2017Joint appendix filed. (2 Volumes) (Statement of costs filed)
- Jul 20 2017Brief of petitioner SAS Institute Inc. filed.
- Jul 20 2017Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association filed.
- Jun 22 2017The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 20, 2017.
- Jun 22 2017The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 5, 2017.
- May 22 2017Petition GRANTED.
- May 15 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 18, 2017.
- Apr 19 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 11, 2017.
- Apr 17 2017Reply of petitioner SAS Institute Inc. filed.
- Apr 05 2017Brief of Federal Respondents in opposition filed.
- Feb 28 2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 5, 2017.
- Jan 31 2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 6, 2017)